| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
oh, and turn of events, that IDJ one is a GIA graded stone too which gives me a tad of reassurance since I'm always iffy of EGL's .. lack of consistency.
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
I HOPE I can find the perfect OEC! and things have been looking up just within the last 24 hours. Grace has said she'll bring more for me to view even ones that are in the 4 carat range just for me to play with. I feel like I'm a kid going to a candy store! And she says she's got a few other 3carat-ers to bring to play, too. So I'm keeping my mind open until I see what she has to offer. I only have my crappy iPhone to take pictures with.. do you think I should ask SO to lug around his DSLR? Or will that be "too forward" to be taking a million pics of a vendors' items? It will offer me higher quality images to share for your advice..I want pave work on the gallery and the shank, as well as a delicate halo, so VC might be my best bet. I like the metal work I saw comparing VC and DBL (I think you posted those?) in a post with a 3 stone, and I agree that DBL has a great benchman for metal work, but I am leaning towards blingyblingyblingy in the gallery if I get to choose my "forever setting". (I'm quite gaudy, I know, sorry lol). OMG Mike would be amazing. Especially since he posts his awesome drawings and every process of making it. I'd LOVE to work with him, but I'm so weary with even shipping between US states, I don't think I can handle the anxiety of shipping out of country! I think he just needs to get his butt over to the US for half the year |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
I notice the inclusion, but in most settings it doesn't show up. I'm not TOO BIG on clarity being a problem. I mean, I'd prefer it to be eye clean under most circumstances, from a reasonable distance.. but that inclusion in particular doesn't bother me since it only shows up under a particular light, and only under a particular angle. So far, that one's not under my immediate radar as it seems JbEG has a few goodies to show me, and IDJ has shown me an awesome one. I'm going to first see what JbEG has, then work from there to see if I even want to bother Jon or continue bothering Adam, even. I almost feel like I'm "cheating" on them when I talk to other vendors! I get so guilty |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Aww, don't worry too much about that. At this point you're not fully involved in the process with one vendor and hopping ship. And since old cuts are a different breed than MRBs, you won't know what you like unless you can look at all kinds of them. The best way to do this is to do exactly what you are doing and looking at what each of the vendors has to offer you. |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Yup, I'm keeping that one in mind but not until after I've already finished meeting with JbEG and finishing up my judgements of that IDJ. I really don't think I can handle too much info at once! I start feeling pressured and then I'll regress just regress in this process. I'm so surprised that I'm able to get this many contenders, though! I'm so happy
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
YAY! I'm so glad you decided to post. Lots of choices! |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Yes, I am glad, but I'm still kind of
that PS doesn't allow us to edit or delete or whatnot.. I don't know how excited I am about this thread being here 10 years later! There's great education here that I'd love to share, sure, but I wish I can pull my identity away from it.. especially with sharing so much personal info on the "other sides". :X
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
People have had threads removed. Only the original poster (you) can request it to be removed, but they can (and have for others) done this before. Surfgirl had every single picture and post removed from all of PS a few years ago (NOT to add drama or get anyone talking about this more than to make the point that it CAN be done because it HAS been done. Please do not derail madelise's thread with SG drama). |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
If you have one an IS will be much easier to use than red paper!
Def a question for Grace - if they'd mind if you take pics (and post them on PS) Yes, I did the comparison pics - the differences are even more striking IRL. But, I do not dispute that VC does very nice pave work, and it's most important that *you* feel good about your vendor choice, whatever you decide
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
The idea is still the same, that the red will show leakage? Or with an IS, the white is leakage right? I'll shoot Grace an email about the camera and if I can post pictures.. ![]() I have the video from IDJ as well as a few new photos, but I'm having trouble uploading them at this moment. It's bed time for me (graveyard shift tonight!) so I'll try again later when I'm up. |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Yeah - with the IS it's switched, white will be "leakage" and red is facets that are taking in and returning light out the top of the stone. Black is facets that are obstructing (reflecting the black of the IS scope eyepiece)
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
What color is it by GIA? |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
It is a GIA K SI2. And for me, frankly, I would take a GIA K Si2 over an EGL J Si1 any day of the week. The EGL could be an I1 by GIA standards, and likely is, and it is probably more tinted. The IDJ stone looks like the inclusions are not noticable, either, though you would have to check of course. Someone asked is EGL is really that lax... the answer is "yes", they are, with the caveat that there is inconsistency with EGL that makes it hard to really predict what a given stone would be by GIA standards. I know of a few larger old cuts that are double certed and the difference in color seems to be 2 grades in those situations. Clarity one grade off. You CANNOT use that as a "conversaion" rule. But it is food for thought when you actually have a GIA candidate. |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
That pre-loved on GOG is a "Q" I believe. Did you see the post of that 3 stone M color AVC's in yellow gold? I was so surprised at how yellow an M could look in a yellow gold setting and they weren't set in a cup...it was beautiful. here it is: http://www.pricescope.com/forum/show-me-the-ring/m-avc-three-stone-in-yellow-gold-t175160.html |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
OH WOW, that looks so yummy! Yes that effect would be "yellow enough" for me. Now I have options! Lots of them! Uh oh I'm having major issues with uploading to PS so forgive me if I upload one image at a time. I've been able to link one then the site will not load properly and I lose that 1 while trying to upload another. ![]() That's 1 of 3 photos IDJ provided me with. |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Okay, I've been trying for HOURS and it won't post properly for me, so sorry I'll have to post off-site. I tried more than 20x in the last few hours! I'm so frustrated with the photo upload thingy! I'm supposed to be knocked out cold sleeping right now, but my anxiety over this is waking me up every so often to check the uploading, lol!
The server must really like driving me nuts! I also tried uploading the video they sent me onto 2 different websites, but I think that video's file is just too big I screenshot the part where it showed the inclusions. Yuketiel swears this is an eye clean stone, but a lot of the video shows that cluster of inclusions. This is a lot larger than the one everyone can't stand on the GOG Consignment stone! What do you guys think? http://i45.tinypic.com/33pezxf.jpg http://i45.tinypic.com/23m8yrr.jpg This is the one screenshot from the video. It's the best I can do. Every time I pause it, the video is blurry. http://i50.tinypic.com/33jjswx.png Here's the cert: http://i48.tinypic.com/2r6kx8x.png again, I apologize for the messiness of this, I really am frustrated after attempting to upload multiple times! |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Hope this helps
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
YES IT DOES thank you so much maisie! What on earth am I doing wrong here! PS hates me I wish you can help me figure out that darn video situation, too!
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
I don't think we can upload videos here. If you can upload it to youtube you can share the link here though. As for the photos, I just saved them to my computer then uploaded them. I'm not sure why it wasn't letting you. I know in the past we had to make sure the file names were unique and not used by someone else uploading a photo. Could that have been it? |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Maybe it's my own internet that's slow? I tried uploading the video to tiny pic as well as imageshack. I'm creating a new youtube account that doesn't link to my identity as we speak ![]() I did rename all those photos to some sort of variety of: aosidasdakasdkhahdahsd. Didn't work
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
The faceting on the IDJ is fabulous!!
I really think the eyeclean question is just something you're going to have to evaluate with your own eyes. The fact that it has a recent GIA report that called it an SI2 is promising - w/ a reputably graded SI you don't have to worry about inclusions that are durability risks, so that's one more box checked off.. |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
I agree, IDJ gets my vote |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
Here's the video, finally uploaded after trying for hours! I think my interwebz connection just sucks.
http://youtu.be/_sq9yxppZME You can see the inclusions more clearly there. I tried to zoom out of the video so that the diamond's size is representably correct to a real-life size, and I can still see it. Luann told me in an email that she has it on hold for me. I don't want to make any decisions until I see all cards on the table when I meet with Grace and secretly, I'm hoping for a bigger spread. oh god. I'm horrible, aren't I? |
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
madelise here is my honest opinion. I think you have akiller budget. But you are emphasizing the 9mm mark so much that it is meaning you have to compromise color or clarity too much (compromising cut s of course not an issue
). If you drop a teensy bit in size you can get everything you want -- cut, 100% eye clean, the color you want, the setting you want! Don't you think its worth it??
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
OK, I am not a fan of the IDJ stone. The still photos look very nice. But with a larger table like that and a relatively shallow crown, and large under table facets, the risk is a stone that is dark too much of the time. Not lively. And in the video that stone does not woo me -- I have concern about the faceting under the table and how much life there is. Also, in the video, I see a lot of "mush" as Yssie calls it, basically leakage -- its the glittery looking brownish-goldy looking areas on the stone. That is not a good thing. Now, the quality of the video is poor. But the make of the stone is one that you have to be careful of, and the video is making me a little leery. I think shallower crowns work better with really small tables, and larger tables work better with longer lower girdle facets than that stone has -- the longer LGF will split up the facets under the table adding life. A big table and shallow crown and short LGF = dull stone.
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
After watching the video of the IDJ stone, I have to agree with you, I can see the inclusions easily. I completely understand wanting to hit the 9 mm mark (fellow size 8 finger here!). But I agree with Dreamer, if that is your top priority, you will have to compromise a little more with color or clarity than I think you are comfortable with at the moment. Also, it sounds like you want a VC halo for the setting, so if you go down a tiny bit in size, you will still get some amazing finger coverage plus the color and clarity you want. I wouldn't stress too much yet, When you meet with Grace, I think you be able to see what in person the color and clarity you are comfortable with and go from there.
|
| Re: Calling Dreamer_D and Yssie and other old cut lovers~ |
|
|
|
I have to agree that the video did not "wow" me. It may be the poor quality of the vid, but... it's probably more than that. My first reaction (though I'm not an expert) was: "wait... where's the cute small table?"
Also, I'll risk sounding a bit like a weirdo, but I was thinking over your possibilities while doing the dishes... I'm like you in that I prefer either whiter stones, or something truly yellow (or preferably brown, like cognac color). But, if I were you, I would not go for a bright yellow style for your ering. You mentioned that this is going to be *the one,* no changes or upgrades. Because of this, I'd make it on the whiter side. Who knows if you'll still like the yellow in a couple years? Instead, you should get your totally dream stone now, and then in a couple years get a nice, bright yellow RHR Ok, I think I'll end my rant here. Good luck with your decisions! |