| Re: Are 36/40.8 angles bad? |
|
|
|
its not optimum and the stone will probably be small for its ct weight, especially if the table is smallish.
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT
HCA and Ideal-scope developer http://www.ideal-scope.com and http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au |
| Re: Are 36/40.8 angles bad? |
|
|
|
Here are the rest of the specs on this rb stone - are the dimensions ok for its carat weight or do you think it will it appear small? Thank you. I posted the specs in another thread and someone mentioned the 36 deg crown was not good. I assumed it would affect the sparkle somehow?
2.6 ct 8.8 x 8.76 x 5.45 Total depth.........62.0% Table size...........57% Crown angle........36.0 deg. Crown height.......15.5% Pavilion angle......40.8 deg. Pavilion depth .....43.0% Star length..........50% Lower half...........80% Girdle................Med. to slightly thick, faceted (3.5%) Culet.................None Polish................Excellent Symmetry...........Excellent Fluorescence.......None |