|
|
|
|
Holy cow your finger size is less than half of mine!
Is it strange to have finger envy?Whatever you get will look huge on your finger, even if it''s the smaller asscher. If we are thinking of the same place, I really like the looks of the 1.21 G and the 1.52 G is also popping. Are you looking for plat or WG? |
|
|
|
|
Chi-AmiGirl - first of all, welcome to Pricescope!
![]() I'm incredibly envious of your size THREE fingers, and I think a 1.25 ct. will look quite sizeable on your finger. BUT, I also am incredibly sentimental, and I wanted my e-ring to be my forever ring, so I didn't ever want to upgrade. If my husband would have allowed me to pitch in some money to get a larger Asscher, I would have absolutely done it. I own a pretty decently cut (IMO) GIA 'G' coloured Asscher, and I think for size, I would have definitely dropped to an H, eye clean SI1. If your purchase is anywhere from 2-6 months away, I would just suggest doing what you're doing. Work with GOG and possibly JA and WF to help you find something very well cut in your specs. It may seem like it might take a while to find the right stone, but the wait is worth it. GOG makes video comparisons, and I bet you could probably getg Sarah to model the two stones mentioned on the back of her hand, but my gut says there are some really gorgeous stones out there, so don't settle too quickly. That 1.21 really appeals to me, though, based on the video. ![]() As far as settings go, have you seen the Danhov Meno collection? The ME25 is one of my favourite split shank settings ever! http://www.jamesallen.com/designer-jewelry/meno-collection-by-danhov/ring/item_294-2040.asp |
|
|
|
|
Sweet- My super long post didn''t scare people off! (I''m on vacation and currently sitting at home w/ a bad case of sun poisoning- so I had some time to write all that and check the replies today lol).
Lite brite- I didn''t really realize how small my hands are until we started looking at rings- I mean, I kinda figured (I''m half asian, about 5 ft, 95 lbs so- def. petite- just like Mom )- But yeah- every jeweler we''ve went to has basically said it''s a teriffic thing as far as ct size goes (and looking at asschers- despite the fact they seem to face up smaller, I shouldn''t have to go over 1.25/1.5 cts)- Unfortunately it''ll take some tweaking as far as settings. And yes- that''s the jeweler- I think I''ve been checking their site twice a day these past few months. Lauren- Thanks for the words of encouragement! (And count me in as a fan of your asscher ring ) The whole thing was that we were considering to getting the ring a few weeks ago, going with the 1.21 & telling our familes up in Chicago, but 1. He decided he didn''t like that it wouldn''t be a surprise at all for me and 2. Our living/ work situation is a bit nutso right now (I moved back to Chicago in Jan. and he was SUPPOSED to follow, but- he might instead take up a couple ther job offers here in Miami (so I might move right back down & we''ll have to start looking at other places to live.... either way- the longer we wait, the more $ we can save, so that''s important too).That''s funny you mention the ME25 setting- I once dragged my friend all the way up to Highland Park,IL, sitting in 2 1/2 hrs of Chicago traffic- just to see a jeweler that sells Danhov settings, b/c I really, really loved the way the ME25 looked on the James Allen site. They didn''t have it in person- but I saw that another poster here got it for his fiance (with a 1.2 something asscher) a few weeks later. Lol. I do love how dainty and well- crafted it is, but the one thing that I personally didn''t like was how the bands & pave had this slight, slight curvature outwards, since they go all the way up to form the prongs (lol, I hope that makes sense!). Then, with it being 2K plus- ehhh- I figured that it might be better to just worry about the center stone/ save a little by going with one of those 1K settings. But then again.... (oh dear- here I go thinking about that again ).You''re right though- we do have time (though he has sworn to me that we''ll be engaged by the time I move back to FL (if that''s what happens)) I''m just hoping life, and all the other stuff we have going on doesn''t get in the way of it. (We''re 26, been together 5 1/2 yrs, known each other since high school (Chicago area)). I have a good feeling about things, though. And I''m so glad I can come here and chat with you guys regarding all this e-ring stuff!
|
|
|
|
|
Chi-AmiGirl, I completely understand about the curve of the ME25.
Have you seen any of the other settings in person? Here are a few split shanks I just came across. http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Diamond-Settings/-Divisi--Diamond-Engagement-Ring-by-WF_1068.htm A little less severe curve. http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Diamond-Settings/-Allegro-in-D--Diamond-Engagement-Ring_1117.htm http://www.knoxjewelers.biz/products/romance---round http://www.knoxjewelers.biz/products/bianca |
|
|
|
|
My e-ring is in plat and I have other rings in WG. If you look through the search results on palladium, people have had mixed results and one jeweler says he no longer wants to work with palladium because he finds it too brittle.
Here is a thread in which John Pollard discusses different palladium mixes: http://www.pricescope.com/forum/rockytalky/palladium-or-platinum-for-a-three-stone-ring-t57430.html It might be a moot consideration though because not all jewelers work in palladium, and especially since you are looking for split shank settings, that might be a small universe. I like platinum best but I have had no problems with my WG rings. And welcome to PS, I lurked for a long time before uncloaking too. :) |