Help with this ASET pic?

[kgrap]

Can anyone help me interpret this ASET picture? Thanks

 

[strmrdr]

simulated aset from gem advisor using sarin data.

pavilion angle is above 40.768 likely 40.9 range.

lgf% is in the 77%-78% height area.
75%-76% depth on the sarin.

stars are over 50% likely closer to 60%
table is in the 55-56 range.

Diamond is bright with good contrast.

girdle is cut for contrast and not painted.

have h&a photo's?

 

[Serg]

Date: 10/30/2005 1:31:31 PM
Author: strmrdr
simulated aset from gem advisor using sarin data.

Strmrdr,

Why do you think: It is Sarin data?

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 10/30/2005 1:38:11 PM
Author: Serg

Date: 10/30/2005 1:31:31 PM

Author: strmrdr

simulated aset from gem advisor using sarin data.

Strmrdr,


Why do you think: It is Sarin data?

1. overall look, ones based on helium scans have a more refined and detailed look.
2. GOG is the only vendor using it so far as a sales tool
3. that has the current GOG classic signiture.
4. GOG is using sarin data for the GA files on his site last I heard.


Further more with that look there is normaly an 80% chance it will have a gia cert but that one has the look of one from the cutter that uses ags certs.
So id lean slightly to it having an ags cert :}

 

[Paul-Antwerp]

Date: 10/30/2005 1:31:31 PM
Author: strmrdr
simulated aset from gem advisor using sarin data.

pavilion angle is above 40.768 likely 40.9 range.

lgf% is in the 77%-78% height area.
75%-76% depth on the sarin.

stars are over 50% likely closer to 60%
table is in the 55-56 range.

Diamond is bright with good contrast.

girdle is cut for contrast and not painted.

have h&a photo''s?

In other words, and more clearly, there is nothing wrong with this ASET-view. Lots of reds, nice blue contrast-pattern.

Live long,

 

[valeria101]

Date: 10/30/2005 1:38:11 PM
Author: Serg

Why do you think: It is Sarin data?

No.

This is not a picture.

Besides, Sarin would not have given some of the detail there. (not sure, really)



PS: Kgrap, these comments have nothing to do with the diamond. In fact, it is the freakin' precission of the cut shown in the ASSET diagram that makes Serg's question intriguing for me. It is easy to tell where a botched model comes from, but this is incredibly close to geometrical precission - so there isn't much to say about it other than how close it is to the textbook model

 

[kgrap]

Thanks alot guys! Is there any where I can see what a text book ASET is supposed to look like for myself?

 

[Regular Guy]

A couple of examples, and some background info...

It''s still a pretty new tool.