Two Diamonds

[surand1]

Well I have narrowed it down to 2 diamonds with better depth percentages. Of course though, I need your help again in picking the better of the two. I was thinking the first one, but the idealscope image looks light red/pink, so I''m not sure how much that would affect the look of the diamond. The second diamond has a smaller table percentage so would it make the diamond look smaller? Thanks for your help.

DIAMOND 1
$3997
0.90 F SI1
HCA: 1.6-EX
DEPTH: 61.9%
TABLE: 57%
CROWN: 34.8°
PAV: 40.8°
GIRDLE: sl thk
CULET: no
POL: vg
SYM: ex
FLR: no
6.16-6.19x3.82
http://www.whiteflash.com/pimg/IdealScope/IS_GIA-13383120.jpg

DIAMOND 2
$4327
0.91 G SI2
HCA: 1-EX
DEPTH: 61.2%
TABLE: 54%
CROWN: 34.6°
PAV: 40.7°
GIRDLE: med-sl thk-f
CULET: pt
POL: ex
SYM: ex
FLR: neg
6.24-627.00x3.83
http://www.whiteflash.com/pimg/IdealScope/IS_AGS-5935601.jpg

 

[belle]

i like #2

no, the smaller table won''t make the diamond look smaller

 

[NoonersMom]

I also like #2 better. It has just a hair larger diameter for the same weight and the girdle is med - slightly thick. The other one has a thick girdle.

 

[Kaleigh]

#2 looks good to me too.

 

[aljdewey]

The light pink on the first IS image isn''t going to be a problem at all.....it''s just more contrast in the stone.

Having said that, I prefer #2. The proportions are just beautiful and so is the IS image. Plus a bit bigger.
As long as it''s eyeclean (which you can confirm with the folks at WF), that would be my first pick.