Ideal scope, H&A, ASET pictures attached. Thoughts?

[Lookinghard]

 

[Texas Leaguer]

Looks good. According to the AGS report it is a Lazare Kaplan branded (inscribed) diamond. As it may have been in circulation for a while (2006 cert), you should get it checked by third party professional for verification and to make sure it is in original condition.

 

[Diamond_Hawk]

This has a lot of appeal to it - nice find!

But...

it may have been in circulation for a while (2006 cert), you should get it checked by third party professional for verification and to make sure it is in original condition.

+1

 

[Karl_K]

Also the Is image appears to be a different diamond than the ASET image and is badly taken.

 

[Lookinghard]

Also the Is image appears to be a different diamond than the ASET image and is badly taken.

What makes it appear that the ASET and IS images are of different diamonds? I can't imagine why they could be different.

 

[Karl_K]

Also the Is image appears to be a different diamond than the ASET image and is badly taken.

What makes it appear that the ASET and IS images are of different diamonds? I can't imagine why they could be different.

no white dots between the arrow heads in the IS like there should be based on the ASET.
The leakage pattern in from the girdle is also very different.
It is badly done and could possibly be the same diamond but it looks different.