shape
carat
color
clarity

weight - size - face up - price

minousbijoux

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
12,815
Chrono|1383142194|3547432 said:
the use of "honey" and "sweetheart" bothers me more. :bigsmile:

Weren't you known as "Chrono-dude" or "Mr. Chrono" by a poster for a while there? I remember it was pretty funny...
 

chrono

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
38,364
Dude's too "chummy" but I don't mind Mr. Chrono at all, other than it sounding a bit too formal. :cheeky:
 

jstarfireb

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
6,232
Chrono|1383151866|3547554 said:
Dude's too "chummy" but I don't mind Mr. Chrono at all, other than it sounding a bit too formal. :cheeky:

Mr. Chrono reminds me of Samwise in Lord of the Rings saying "Mr. Frodo!"
 

PrecisionGem

Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
2,030
Chrono|1383142194|3547432 said:
Guess I'm not as sensitive as others; the use of "honey" and "sweetheart" bothers me more. :bigsmile:

Gene,
Going off a tangent here since I think the answer is quite clear for gems in the $1k price range. Would you still have the same opinion if the item is $1000/ct? $5000/ct?

Actually I was trying to get general opinion of group here. If I were to cut a stone for my own use, or my wife, then certainly I would always go for the most beautiful stone. Weight really would mean nothing to me or my wife. I'm sure she has no idea what the sapphire she wears weights, nor does she care. But she does like how it looks.

I'm not sure if you realize that very often jewelers or dealers will send native or commercial cut stones out to be touched up to improve performance. Recently I saw a ruby that was around $400,000 that had some work done it to improve the beauty of the stone. Some weight was lost, but it was sold at a higher price. Size isn't everything. Last year in Tucson I had lunch with some people who do cutting in California, they only worked with very high end stones $50k and up, and everything they touched were clean ups or recuts they were doing. They were in the business to make money not loose it.

To me it's a lot like beer and other things in life. I don't drink much, but when I do, I prefer a nice micro brew. I would rather pay $15 for a 6 pack of quality beer, then $15 for a case of Bud. I know I can be a PC with the speed processor as my Mac for less, but I enjoy the quality of the Mac and will pay more per MB for it.
 

chrono

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
38,364
The jewellers in my neck of the woods obviously did not get the memo to touch up or recut their coloured stones. Just a handful are precision cut whilst the rest are obviously commercial cut.
 

PrecisionGem

Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
2,030
I know your neck of the woods. It a bit more civilized than mine, but I would guess a lot of your jewelers are out in the woods shooting at deer like mine are! I have never sold a stone in 100 mile radius of where I now live.
 

Starzin

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Messages
1,850
Here's an interesting question. As a cutter, we are always faced with compromises when cutting a stone. One is often weight. So the question is, if you had a choice of a stone to be cut and yield 10 cts for $100 per ct or $1000 total, or the same stone cut, but the weight would be 8 cts and the price $125 per ct for a total of $1000. Which would you take. Now the face up size would be exactly the same, but the 10 ct stone would have excess weight in the belly and maybe a keel pavilion, where the 8 ct stone wouldn't, and would have a nicer cut and performance.

Hmmm... I read this a little differently to most I think. So I will make some assumptions based on how I understood the question.

Assume the cutter is faced with a nice piece of rough (perhaps a well saturated seafoam tourmaline) and he knows he can use one of two patterns to cut it. Both will be well cut and attractive stones when finished. Same face up size, same price.

However - one will be lovely - it is NOT native cut or sloppy, it's still a precision cut (presumably).
One will be more sparkly and have that "WOW that looks great!" factor.

Now which do you choose as the cutter? If you do the weight cut presumably you can do it quickly and easily but it might sit in inventory for a year. OR do you do the other cut which takes more time (hence the increased price per carat) and results in a slightly less weight but will sell inside a week/month or two?

Which do you choose as the buyer? The one that's lovely or the one that's oh so sparkly? :???: Same price, same face up size - you only know it weighs 2cts more because the seller told you.

Gene you're playing with my head!!! However I think because I can't SEE the extra weight, I'm gonna choose the sparkly one. Unfortunately, I think this has more implications for the cutter than the buyer, we're like magpies we're attracted by sparkly things ;))

Whew! I'm glad that decision's made :lol:
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top