What do you think of these RBs??

[LitigatorChick]

Diamond 1:
GIA Certificate
6.63x6.68x4.23
1.16 ct
G SI2. (inclusions are on edge of stone and white. Hard to see even under loupe)
polish and symmetry both excellent
Cut grade very good
table 57
Crown angle 34.5
Pavilion angle 41.6

Diamond 2:
AGS Certificate
6.49x6.55x4.14
1.088 ct
H SI1 (inclusion is a very faint cloud. Hard to see under loupe as well)
Polish and symmetry both ideal
Table 56.9
crown angle 35.4
Pavilion angle 41.6

If you need any other details from the certificate let me know.

Thanks everyone!!!

 

[stone-cold11]

No good.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Did you put the numbers into the HCA? I normally look for pav. angles at 41.0 max.

 

[Lorelei]

Diamond 1:
GIA Certificate
6.63x6.68x4.23
1.16 ct
G SI2. (inclusions are on edge of stone and white. Hard to see even under loupe)
polish and symmetry both excellent
Cut grade very good
table 57
Crown angle 34.5
Pavilion angle 41.6

Diamond 2:
AGS Certificate
6.49x6.55x4.14
1.088 ct
H SI1 (inclusion is a very faint cloud. Hard to see under loupe as well)
Polish and symmetry both ideal
Table 56.9
crown angle 35.4
Pavilion angle 41.6

If you need any other details from the certificate let me know.

Thanks everyone!!!

Hi Litchick,

I would pass on both of these for the following reasons. The first has a very steep pavilion angle which can be undesirable, this can cause light leakage. The second not only has another very steep pavilion angle but this is exacerbated by a steep crown angle also, what we call a ' steep deep'. This also means light leakage is a probability, this means light will escape from the diamond and it won't sparkle as well as it could do. In severe cases you can sometimes see a dark ring around the table of the stone, known as ' the ring of death.'

I would keep looking personally, did you find these online? What are they intended for, an engagement ring?

 

[LitigatorChick]

Thanks everyone. Helping a friend shop for an engagement ring. These were shown to him by a local diamond broker I have used in the past.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

He is unlikely to find the quality of stones that we have recommended already. But perhaps that is not something he values.