shape
carat
color
clarity

GIA dated Feb 2003

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

carrieq

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
29
Should I be concerned buying a diamond whose GIA was dated in Feb 2003? Should I assume this means the diamond is hard to sell. I have not seen the diamond in person, and only have the GIA and sarin information. It is from Diamonds by Lauren.
 

pqcollectibles

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Feb 22, 2003
Messages
3,441
Since you have the Sarin, crunch the HCA and see how the diamond rates.

There are any number of reasons a diamond can have an older Cert. It's not really anything to worry about as long as the diamond is a good performer and priced appropriately.
1.gif
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
I would not assume it's hard to sell...it also may have been sold and returned for an upgrade or other reasons...I would be very interested in the specs of the stone? Is it a fancy colored stone...David sells quite a lot of them...I'm not sure the market for colored is as strong as for white ...that could be a reason...More info please!!!!
 

carrieq

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
29
Thanks for your replies. As so kindly requested, here is more info on the stone. It is a E colored princess cut .90 carat stone. Please note the variations in sarin vs. GIA too...should this be of concern?

GIA:
5.46 X 5.44 X 3.70
DEPTH: 68%
tABLE: 64%
bIRDLE: stk TO thk
cULET: None
pOILISH: Excellent
sYMMETRY: Very Good
cLARITY: VS1
Color: E
Flourescence: Faint

Sarin: 5.39 x 5.44
Depth: 68.7
Table: 69.9
Crown: 9.0
Pavillion: 41.6

I know the crown is not ideal (seems from my readings bigger is better), the retailer has said it is very well cut and is one of the best princess cuts he's seen.
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
Carrie- that's messed up. First, I was shocked to see that the crown was only 9 with a 64 table. That would be WEIRD.....It is more understandable with the depth at 68 and the table at 69. SOMETHING IS WRONG. I know David has a good rep on the other site...but that would scare me off...I would ask him to send it out to an indep appraiser first...The GIA is off I bet...is it the same stone?
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
I can't believe David has no explanation for this. Did you ask him? I have never heard of such a variation...
 

carrieq

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
29
My husband has been doing the talking with Dave/Marc...and I don't think he has asked either one. I thought the variation was strange too. Hmmm. Thanks for the input...we'll have to get a separate apparaisal as you suggested. For my understanding, why do you assume the GIA is incorrect and not the sarin?
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
Hmmm, I don't know enough about the sarin to tell.. maybe something could have caused the error...I would ask him to run it again...There could be a problem with the machine? Dunno. BUT what shocks me is that Diamonds By Lauren has not made an issue of this...that is absurd.
 

Rank Amateur

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
1,555
What's wierd about the 9% crown?

I find the sarin v. GIA difference in the table % much more strange.
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
I think considering the spread of the stone and the 68 table and 64 depth, I would expect a greater crown %... I would expect a 9 from a 68 depth and 69 table...that's what's weird to me.
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
LOL...and that's why the difference is strange
1.gif
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
ARGH. I messed that up...68 depth, 64 table.
 

Rank Amateur

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
1,555
The depth % might be solely a result of the pavillion arrangement/depth. It would have no bearing on the crown height or the table %. That is to say that you could have two diamonds with the same diameter, table, and crown with different pavillions, which would lead to different depth % but the other numbers would remain the same.
 

moremoremore

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,825
so you would not expect a stone with a 68/64 to have a better crown than 9?
 

carrieq

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
29
That's what I'm wondering too. If the crown % will increase if the GIA is accurate.

My husband spoke with Diamonds by Lauren and he offered to redo the sarin. He is positive this is the correct GIA for this stone. He (the retailer) said the table % may vary from sarin to GIA because depending on which facets you use to do your calc. you may get a different result, but he too was wondering why such the drastic difference. I'll keep you updated on what happens. Thank you all for your interest, advice, and help!
twirl.gif
Feel free to post your comments/thoughts/predictions on this issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top