- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Messages
- 320
Wow.
I clicked on this thread which was seemingly initiated to address an interesting topic.
I was stunned however, to actually read its intended message.
It was a struggle for me to decide to post on this thread in defense of RD.
Some would argue that it is not my responsibility to defend another vendor
who is and should be completely capable of defending himself.
However, I cannot remain silent here, even as I am aware that it may not be PC for me (as a PS vendor)
to engage here and that perhaps most (or all) of my PS vendor colleagues will safely opt to stay away
from this thread like the plague, even if they may silently concur with my point.
This thread was initiated to ostensibly provide general and constructive feedback to the PS community.
Accordingly, a general (and ultimately misleading) title was applied to the thread.
The subsequent posting however, clearly demonstrates an agenda to (publicly) destroy RD personally and professionally.
It is true that RD is ultimately responsible (and accountable) for his public persona
and comments/advice on this forum......so is everyone else.
There IS a protocol set up by the moderators which runs counter to what has been done here.
Postings and comments you believe to be offensive, should be reported to the moderators directly.
The moderators will decide on the best course of action to deal with these complaints.
I clicked on this thread which was seemingly initiated to address an interesting topic.
I was stunned however, to actually read its intended message.
It was a struggle for me to decide to post on this thread in defense of RD.
Some would argue that it is not my responsibility to defend another vendor
who is and should be completely capable of defending himself.
However, I cannot remain silent here, even as I am aware that it may not be PC for me (as a PS vendor)
to engage here and that perhaps most (or all) of my PS vendor colleagues will safely opt to stay away
from this thread like the plague, even if they may silently concur with my point.
This thread crosses the line.
This thread was initiated to ostensibly provide general and constructive feedback to the PS community.
Accordingly, a general (and ultimately misleading) title was applied to the thread.
The subsequent posting however, clearly demonstrates an agenda to (publicly) destroy RD personally and professionally.
It is true that RD is ultimately responsible (and accountable) for his public persona
and comments/advice on this forum......so is everyone else.
There IS a protocol set up by the moderators which runs counter to what has been done here.
Postings and comments you believe to be offensive, should be reported to the moderators directly.
The moderators will decide on the best course of action to deal with these complaints.
My two cents.