Nicky Hilton and Christine Baumgartner
Click to view full-size image.
Related topics
|
|
|
|
by reena » October 20th, 2004, 8:52 am
okay, now this picture is even worse, but here's the ring that that horrid nicky hilton had during her "marriage" to that random ape-like investment manager she got hitched to in vegas a few weeks ago. (apparently they're having it annuled--I'M SHOCKED! just kidding. she's really got a good head on her shoulder, that one. HA.) as you can read in the blurb, the ring is apparently a family heirlooom of the groom's. it's an estimated 9 to 12 carats and supposedly worth about $1 million. i can't really tell whether it is an EC or a radiant or something, but it appears to have some (extremely overwhelmed-lookin) trillions on the side. and as you can also see, she IS giving the ring back. (like she needs to hold onto it. she could buy three of those before breakfast and not blink an eye.)
|
|
|
|
|
i think that would be ME, for taking the trouble to save the articles, remembering to bring them to work, running them thru the copier a few times so as to get optimal contrast, scanning them to pdf, e-mailing them to myself, print-screening them into paint, cutting and pasting them into a new paint file, and posting them. i REALLY didn't feel like doing work today.
|
|
|
|
|
HI: You are halir Reena. I've found that work is generally overrated anyway.  cheers Sharon |
|
|
|
|
OK- you win- for now. 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if this was an elaborate "cover up," but it was my understanding from something I watched about celebrity wedding on E! or VH1 or the like that her original e-ring was never supposed to be the real one. Neil Lane was on, saying that Kevin stopped in and picked out the ring, but was going to let her pick out her own for the wedding. There was some vaguely logical reason behind which I don't remember. But they made it sound like the original one was just a temporary all along.
Who knows? Joan Rivers could have shamed him into concocted such a ridiculous story to save face though... |
|
|
|
|
i know--such a shame.  i don't know what we would have done in middle school if we couldn't have pranked people. |
|
|
|
|
Just a question, but what does it matter if he had given her a "smaller" ring in the first place or this "bling"? Is it really all about the size that proves love? If he has a lot of money, why does it mean he's cheap if he didn't get a ring as big as everyone else out there?
Don't get me wrong, I love diamonds, and if I had that kind of money, I sure as hell would get BIG diamonds, and LOTS of them, but isn't it the thought that counts?  My fiance could have gotten me a larger ring, and was prepared to do so. I figured that since we have so many more things to buy first and put away for I didn't find it prudent (almost wasteful after a certain point)... so should I be upset and doubt his love for me by the size of my ring? Sorry if I misinterpret, but I was absolutely disgusted by Jaon Rovers, and it seemed like people were validating her words by giving Costner flack. |
