| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
. Here is pic of Raytech faceter used as a model for above conceot illustration. A beauty of the tripod-type faceter is that you can lift the handpiece off the machine and turn it over to check progress on a facet. This is similar to machines I have seen in Europe.
. My son saw similar in Burma, for cutting sapphires and rubies, except there the two back feet of the tripod rested on a shelf behind the cutter; it was so long that the arc radius was too great to have significant effect on the angle of the dop to the lap. The tripod was a tree branch, the dop was a nail, indexing was by eye - turning the nail in a slot which was tightened with a wing nut. Four cutters used the same wheel at the same time. It doesn't have to be fancy to be adequate.
|
| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
Bruce, I never saw spherical lap for diamonds.
we use cylindrical lap for bruiting Fancy cuts and can polishing( block) flat facet on girdle.( we have plans to develop similar for other facets. But current cylindrical laps are good enough only for blocking diamond cut. this technology is not good enough for final polishing yet If we are speaking about last microns for diamond facets everything become very difficult even for cool polishing process by cylindrical lap I doubt what is possible compensate 1 micron convexity by such way , because it could be 1 micron for one facet but 2 microns or zero for other facets |
| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
Sergey: To clarify:
. This is concept. I have not seen it either. I will not pursue it unless there is interest. . The 125mm radius lap is 1 micron crown for 1mm width, 2 micron for 2mm, etc. . If you are worried about beam exapnsion, you will prefer spherical to cylindrical concavity, yes? |
| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
. Attached are ways to produce PERFECT spherical surface without precision equipment. I have done it both ways and also with cast-iron lap (as for lenses). I show this only because many shop people are not familar with these methods.
|
| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
Beryl do you suggest that polishing each facet as concave would reduce the dispersion of the fire exiting a facet? (I assume the effect on entry would not have as much effect as the exit effect?)
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT
HCA and Ideal-scope developer http://www.ideal-scope.com and http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au |
| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
Garry:
. That would be true. . Sergey's desire is to eliminate conVEX facets, which are the result of fast lapping (too much polish flowing under leading edge of facet), because they make a beam more divergent (see his comment in 'Fire' thread). Laps which theoretically produce conCAVE facets shoul reduce this tendency; it is not suggested that they produce concave facets (thread title is incorrect). . Note, above, that he(?) is already using cylindrical laps but spherical would be more correct. I am just suggesting a way to do it, and had expected a positive response. I have several things in mind for the 'vertical' adjustment problem described in the opening post, but will not waste time pursuing them if there is no interest. . Paul (Infinity): do you think ADRI* might be interested? * ADRI = Belgian manufacturer of diamond-cutting equipment I visited with Paul. |
| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
Beryl the would wear on the cylindrical or spherical lap influence facet accuracy?
What diameter / radius would you envisage the spherical lap as being?
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT
HCA and Ideal-scope developer http://www.ideal-scope.com and http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au |
| Re: Concave Facets |
|
|
|
The tools or the faceting styles?
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT
HCA and Ideal-scope developer http://www.ideal-scope.com and http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au |