It's all about diamonds,
diamond grading and diamond prices

What should you pay for your diamonds?

| tutorial | cut adviser | ideal-scope | price stats | forum | appraisers | vendors | tips | faq | about 

HCA - Defining the Beauty and Desirability of Round Brilliant Diamonds

Garry Holloway
Abstract
Introduction
Inverse Relationship
Previous Research
DiamCalc
Fire- & Ideal-Scopes
GilbertsonScope
Developing HCA
Brill, fire, scint., spread
Method
Brilliance
Fire or Dispersion
Scintillation
Spread
Summary
Table size
Girdle thickness
Fisheye
Culet
Adjustment to HCA
No Go Zone
Flawed cut grading
BIC and FIC
Seeing is believing?
Accuracy
Market values
Links & References
Holloway Cut Adviser

Table Size Adjustments

Table 3. Adjustments made for table size. Arrows (<- />) indicate penalties continue below 50% and above 65% table sizes.
Table size: Too Small Optimum Too Large
  <- 50% 53% 53% - 60% 60% - 65% ->
Brilliance score <- 1.0 to 0 0 0 to 1.0 ->
  <- 50% 53% 53% - 58% 58% - 65% ->
Fire <- 0.5 to 0 0 0 to 1.0 ->
Scintillation <- 0.5 to 0 0 0 to 1.0 ->

Cross correlation of widely different table sizes shows that this factor has less impact on diamond beauty than is commonly thought (this was also noted in the GIA’s Brilliance study).
 
A penalty factor for table sizes was applied to each of the beauty factors. (See Table 3). For example a diamond with a table size 62.5% has penalty scores of brilliance 0.5, fire 0.643, and scintillation 0.643, giving an additional penalty of 1.786. This means it is possible for a diamond with an ideal combination of crown and pavilion angles and a 62.5% table to score below two or excellent.


Figure 18. Note the stars becomes thinner as the table size increases. (A side note - the table reflection of the 68% table diamond indicates it has the deepest pavilion. But all 4 images have identical crown and pavilion angles. Liddicoat’s widely used ‘Rapid sight estimates’ method, for visually estimating pavilion depth based on the size of their table reflections, does not work. Variations in crown angle introduce another error. It is paradoxical that the main reason the trade quotes pavilion data as a % and crown in degree’s is because of the mistaken belief that experts could accurately estimate pavilion depth %. The industry must change and drop Pavilion % and begin to use angles.)

It can be seen that as table size increases the black stars in the stones are seen to become thinner and less well defined. (We know a method for compensating this effect.)
 

<< Summary  |  Girdle thickness >>
 


Search & Compare | Diamond Tutorial | Holloway Cut Adviser | Diamond Q&A Forum | Price Stats | Buying Tips | What to Buy
Ideal-Scope | Engagement rings | DiamondCatcher | Featured Vendors | Sellers Facet | F A Q | About | Disclaimer | Contact Us

LEGAL NOTICE: Copyright © 2000-2010 Pricescope Inc. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer

Archived Old Forum | Message board index