It's all about diamonds,
diamond grading and diamond prices

What should you pay for your diamonds?

| tutorial | cut adviser | ideal-scope | price stats | forum | appraisers | vendors | tips | faq | about 

HCA - Defining the Beauty and Desirability of Round Brilliant Diamonds

Garry Holloway
Abstract
Introduction
Inverse Relationship
Previous Research
DiamCalc
Fire- & Ideal-Scopes
GilbertsonScope
Developing HCA
Brill, fire, scint., spread
Method
Brilliance
Fire or Dispersion
Scintillation
Spread
Summary
Table size
Girdle thickness
Fisheye
Culet
Adjustment to HCA
No Go Zone
Flawed cut grading
BIC and FIC
Seeing is believing?
Accuracy
Market values
Links & References
Holloway Cut Adviser

Summary

Table 2. Weightings for Holloway Cut Adviser
FactorScore Exc.Very Good GoodFair Poor
Brilliance 0 - 40 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.61.6 - 2.4 2.4 - 3.23.2 - 4.0
Fire0 - 2 0 - 0.40.4 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.21.2 - 1.6 1.6 - 2.0
Scintillation0 - 2 0 - 0.40.4 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.21.2 - 1.6 1.6 - 2.0
Spread0 - 2 0 - 0.40.4 - 0.8 0.8 - 1.21.2 - 1.6 1.6 - 2.0
Total Score0 - 10 0 - 22 - 4 4 - 66 – 8 8 - 10

The Table 2 shows the relative weightings allotted to each of the four factors. The uniqueness of this approach is it recognises the holistic or co-dependant nature of all of a diamonds proportions.
 
A summary example of total scores for diamonds with a table size of 56% is shown in the topographic chart (Fig. 17).


Figure 17.

<< Spread  |  Table size >>
 


Search & Compare | Diamond Tutorial | Holloway Cut Adviser | Diamond Q&A Forum | Price Stats | Buying Tips | What to Buy
Ideal-Scope | Engagement rings | DiamondCatcher | Featured Vendors | Sellers Facet | F A Q | About | Disclaimer | Contact Us

LEGAL NOTICE: Copyright © 2000-2008 Pricescope Inc. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer

Archived Old Forum | Message board index